At the beginning of century XXI the Aboriginal Education gave a jump of great relevance in the Brazilian scene or ties world-wide, this pleases to all the Educators Aboriginal in special way me (graduating Aboriginal Intercultural Pedagogia for the University of the State of Amazon – UEA), as one of the integrant aboriginal educator. In the Brazilian or world-wide scene the aboriginal focus becomes the reason of the fondness to understand the person of the aboriginal, but as human being this culture becomes questionable for many. People such as David G. DeWalt would likely agree. Of I begin the education aboriginal always was placed in the vision of the foreign anthropologists, to put becomes I make a mistake for the aboriginal educators, therefore we have our extremely opposing vision of what he was placed by the anthropologists, this in them we fortify clearly that the aboriginals of century XXI, already they are not the same ones of the remote vision placed by researchers. The Aboriginal Education exceeds all the forecasts, these citizens possesss its culture its way of living to speak above all the respect with its fellow creature, and more, possesss the religion-catolicismo dispatches by post for the Church Catholic (region of the High River Black), this means that they have the soul, knows to read and to write, already they are not illiterate, and the scene aboriginal already we have graduated, mestrados and doctors ema some area in the world of science. If the aboriginals are graduated: BECAUSE TO THINK THAT THEY ARE GRAFOS? A human being with this thought to the aboriginals, aplicadamente is a long-eared one (B) Therefore, to want to understand the being aboriginal, obviously to have much capacity open and brought up to date of the world contemporary.
Music would have to be taught to the young, being forbidden the use of flutes or any instrument of blow, since they hindered the use of the word. (p 159) Types of constitution and governments the constitution is the great ordenadora of the diverse magistracies and is it who determines the sovereignty of the state and the type of government, therefore it has six types of constitution, three pure ones and three impure ones, each one corresponds to a type of government. The three first ones correspond, the royalty, the aristocracy and the republic and the three last ones, the tyranny, the oligarchy and the democracy. (p 168 – 169) Aristotle summarizes the diverse types of government in two: ' ' the democracy and the oligarchy ' ' (pg. 171). It has the democracy when the power is at the hands of the free men and has the oligarchy when the government is under domain of the rich ones. The democracy has for base the equality, that is, in it in such a way the poor person how much the rich one if finds in the same platform, already the oligarchy has for bedding the inaquality, in it who orders is the rich ones, fitting to the poor persons to obey and to be oppressed. (p 175 – 177) Causes of the revolts and prevention the governing must be intent to its citizens, therefore these can be rebelled with the type of government and finish wanting change.
(p 225) Therefore Aristotle goes to say: ' ' the ones are rebelled that inhale the equality, when imagine that, although the equality of the rights, them is inferior to a certain classroom of privileges; the partisans of the inaquality and the privileges disturb the peace, when they imagine that only they possess an equal or lesser part of poder.' ' (pg. 227) This desire generally part of the poor persons in relation to the rich ones, or of the rich ones in relation to other rich ones, when they perceive that others possess privileges more. The disproportionate growth of part any of the state is cause of conflicts, for example, when the rich ones grow disproportionately in relation to the poor persons or vice versa. When enemy of the government they assume an important public office it can be responsible for revolts in the city, for example, somebody that the oligarchical government defends, but lives in a democracy. (p 229-230) Many states conserve its integrity for remaining itself moved away from the causes of the revolts, as of they will be prevented against possible revolts. Between the prevention we have the control of the limit of richness of each citizen, in order to prevent that some if becomes more powerful of what the state. (p 242 – 243) Aristotle in sight to brighten up conflicts between groups partners defends that the classroom measured would have to surpass its extremities, therefore stimulates to all the legislators to invest in this classroom. (p 185) Conclusion Therefore Aristotle establish diverse types of government, as of orientation so that the magistrates and governors govern with tranquillity its city, in order to favor the unit of the customs between its citizens and the progress of the state.
The CONFIDENCE Based on a code of norms and behaviors the confidence adheres to many social characteristics, either in any field that will have the necessity of its presence, and is not few, being thus it always has the existence of the confidence as a tuner of ideas and ideals. The government positions are based on the confidence on the people, since they are these that attribute under any or vote form another form of choice, its governing, democratically speaking. Societies basically are firmed in confidence, as well as; marriages, alliances of war and peace, friendships, and other spheres that exist two or more people, everything turns primarily around the confidence. Exactly when one of the parts knows that it could not be having to the same profitability that to another one. This exchange of interests generally firmed in alliances, society or simply investiture of responsibilities can very be directed well by the reason most of the time, exactly that I begin what it was had as rational something can later be seen as been improper. Or when it has the treason of one of the parts and I negotiate all it comes to be deploring to the other part. However the confidence has for proper itself the responsibility to bring us it tranquillity to be able to take our attitudes and thus to form what we call society, yes, therefore the experience in society alone if is possible when we have the personal availability to open hand of fears and incredulidades and to attribute to other fellow citizens trustworthiness that also is configured we for others. It makes thus if then, small parcels reliable, that later are materialized in bigger things augmenting in what it refers to all society. They are psychoactive constructions that appear in way to the necessities social human beings and in them if they credit to all the segments of our lives, simply moved by the reason and some times also for the emotions, already there leaving fully the rational scope or in case that some variant acts that not condiz with the waited one facilitates the discharge of guilt for this feeling.